Skip to content

FAN control OMV Auyfan 0.10.12: gitlab-ci-linux-build-184, Kernel 5.6

Linux
  • Hey,

    I will do it in english, hope it is okay. Thanks, for very informative forum.

    My question is, is it possible to control the FAN in the newest OMV Auyfan 0.10.12: gitlab-ci-linux-build-184, Kernel 5.6?
    The install was very easy no problems at all, the only problem is i did try some different commands to reach the fan, but was not able to get it going. Do somebody know how? Thanks.

    Best Regards.
    Soeren

  • Hi Soeren,

    I have this succesfully running.

    Kind Regards
    Martin

  • @mabs sagte in FAN control OMV Auyfan 0.10.12: gitlab-ci-linux-build-184, Kernel 5.6:

    Hi Soeren,

    I have this succesfully running.

    Kind Regards
    Martin

    Thanks, i will try the fan tool again. I'm almost sure i did try without luck, have you edited something in the fan tool conf..?

  • Hi,

    I only played with two parameters.

    I have two rockpro64 boards, currently one has a small fan and the other one has a large fan.

    Therefore I changed PROFILE_NR accordingly.

    Also I have ALWAYS_ON on true on the one with the large fan, but don't see a difference. The fan goes on and off still, maybe I misinterpreted the parameter.

    Also I just noticed now that the CTL settings of the version on github changed slightly, but I think this only improved the detection depending of the kernel settings.

    M

  • @mabs

    With the new OMV kernel 5.6 image from Auyfan, i can't get the FAN to spin - If the fan spins it runs really slow, no sound from the fan.

    With the FAN tool the master installation "failed" and with the release installation it did report "active"..
    I have installed a 92mm FAN inside the NAS case, it runs on Armbian with kernel 5.4.32

    I will open op the case later today to be sure. Thanks.

  • Hi,

    Now i did find the fan, here it goes "nano /sys/devices/platform/pwm-fan/hwmon/hwmon3/pwm1" it is at "0" can be controlled to "255"

    Best Regards.

  • Yes that is basically the way ATS is doing the changing as well I think, as those /sys entries are in the _CTL variables.

    good that you got it working, or are you only half way?

    M

  • @mabs

    The tool works on all image under 5.4 or so for me. But yes i am at the finish line, just wanted the fan to be always on. Just wanted to share, if someone will run in the same problems. Thanks.

  • Helpful Thread!

    But, ATS don't work for me on kernel 5.6 with ayufan release. Only this command works.

    nano /sys/devices/platform/pwm-fan/hwmon/hwmon3/pwm1
    

    Thanks @soerenderfor for the hint.

  • Ok, problem in ATS is this?

    -- FAN Control[ String ]
    	PWM_CTL		= {
    			"/sys/class/hwmon/hwmon0/pwm1",
    			"/sys/devices/platform/pwm-fan/hwmon/hwmon0/pwm1",
    			"/sys/devices/platform/pwm-fan/hwmon/hwmon1/pwm1"
    	},
    
  • @FrankM - did you try fix the ATS tool, if yes. Will it Work?

    Best Regards.

  • Hi,

    since I'm currently change my rockpro64 setup I came across this.

    With the kernel from ayufan you need to set PWM_CTL to

    /sys/devices/platform/pwm-fan/hwmon/hwmon3/pwm1
    

    for my self compiled one I need

    /sys/devices/platform/pwm-fan/hwmon/hwmon0/pwm1
    

    But I got it only working with one entry for PWM_CTL e.g.

    PWM_CTL		= "/sys/devices/platform/pwm-fan/hwmon/hwmon0/pwm1",
    

    after that you need to start ats again

    sudo systemctl stop ats
    sudo systemctl start ats
    

    initially the fan should start immediately for a short period of time.

    In case it is even a different one on your kernel you can find the right one using this command.

    sudo find /sys -name pwm1 | grep hwmon
    

    So far I'm not sure which kernel parameter or modul changes this.

    Martin

  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    260 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Star64 - Warnung

    Angeheftet Star64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    52 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • checkmk - Apache2 vs. NGINX

    checkmk
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    472 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Ich musste am Ende wieder den Apachen installieren, da checkmk zu viele Abhängigkeiten hat. So was wie omd-apache2(?), wurde mir dann als Fehler angezeigt. Die Server waren auf einmal offline usw. Schade, aber letztendlich für den Container auch egal.

    Oben im Apachen die SSL Sicherheit erhöht.

    4ba2853c-d5a3-422d-b787-b9f66256b511-grafik.png

  • Debian 11 Bullseye released!

    Linux
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    283 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Mein Systemadmin auf der Arbeit meinte heute, angesprochen auf das Problem, läuft der Network-Manager? Ok, gute Frage...... Schauen wir mal.

    Ich bin mir leider nicht 100% sicher, ob er vor meinem Eingreifen lief, ich denke aber schon. Warum ich unsicher bin?

    root@debian:~# systemctl enable systemd-networkd.service Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/dbus-org.freedesktop.network1.service → /lib/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.service. Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/systemd-networkd.service → /lib/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.service. Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/systemd-networkd.socket → /lib/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.socket. Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/network-online.target.wants/systemd-networkd-wait-online.service → /lib/systemd/system/systemd-networkd-wait-online.service.

    Ok, danach

    root@debian:~# systemctl start systemd-networkd.service root@debian:~# systemctl status systemd-networkd.service ● systemd-networkd.service - Network Service Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.service; enabled; ven> Active: active (running) since Tue 2021-08-17 17:36:38 CEST; 6s ago TriggeredBy: ● systemd-networkd.socket Docs: man:systemd-networkd.service(8) Main PID: 1288 (systemd-network) Status: "Processing requests..." Tasks: 1 (limit: 19087) Memory: 3.9M CPU: 39ms CGroup: /system.slice/systemd-networkd.service └─1288 /lib/systemd/systemd-networkd Aug 17 17:36:38 debian systemd[1]: Starting Network Service... Aug 17 17:36:38 debian systemd-networkd[1288]: enp25s0: Gained IPv6LL Aug 17 17:36:38 debian systemd-networkd[1288]: Enumeration completed Aug 17 17:36:38 debian systemd[1]: Started Network Service.

    Danach ging immer noch nix.

    root@debian:/etc/network# ^C root@debian:/etc/network# nmcli device show GENERAL.DEVICE: wlx7cdd907cbec2 GENERAL.TYPE: wifi GENERAL.HWADDR: BA:59:C0:76:C7:F5 GENERAL.MTU: 1500 GENERAL.STATE: 20 (nicht verfügbar) GENERAL.CONNECTION: -- GENERAL.CON-PATH: -- GENERAL.DEVICE: enp25s0 GENERAL.TYPE: ethernet GENERAL.HWADDR: 30:9C:23:60:C6:8E GENERAL.MTU: 1500 GENERAL.STATE: 10 (nicht verwaltet) GENERAL.CONNECTION: -- GENERAL.CON-PATH: -- WIRED-PROPERTIES.CARRIER: an IP4.ADDRESS[1]: 192.168.3.169/24 IP4.GATEWAY: 192.168.3.1 IP4.ROUTE[1]: dst = 192.168.3.0/24, nh = 0.0.0.0, mt = 0 IP4.ROUTE[2]: dst = 0.0.0.0/0, nh = 192.168.3.1, mt = 0 IP6.ADDRESS[1]: 2a02:908:1260:13bc:329c:23ff:xxxx:xxxx/64 IP6.ADDRESS[2]: fd8a:6ff:2880:0:329c:23ff:fe60:c68e/64 IP6.ADDRESS[3]: fe80::329c:23ff:fe60:c68e/64 IP6.GATEWAY: fe80::e4d3:f0ff:fe8f:2354 IP6.ROUTE[1]: dst = fe80::/64, nh = ::, mt = 256 IP6.ROUTE[2]: dst = ::/0, nh = fe80::e4d3:f0ff:fe8f:2354, mt = 1024 IP6.ROUTE[3]: dst = 2a02:908:xxxx:xxxx::/64, nh = ::, mt = 256 IP6.ROUTE[4]: dst = fd8a:6ff:2880::/64, nh = ::, mt = 256

    Jetzt hatte ich das erste Mal einen Ansatz, wonach ich suchen musste.

    GENERAL.STATE: 10 (nicht verwaltet)

    Etwas Suche im Netz und dann das

    nano /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf

    Inhalt der Datei

    [main] plugins=ifupdown,keyfile [ifupdown] managed=false

    Das false in true geändert. Danach ein

    systemctl restart NetworkManager

    und ich konnte den Network-Manager auf dem Desktop benutzen!?!?!?

    Bildschirmfoto vom 2021-08-17 18-07-25.png

    Irgendwas ist da durcheinander im Bullseye 😳

  • Kopia 0.7.0-rc1 Kurztest

    Kopia
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    293 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Nachdem ich doch ziemlich lange Snapshot Zeiten hatte, habe ich Jarek mal gefragt woran das liegt.

    I guess you could run it in the cloud but latency will be progressively worse
    because it's a chatty protocol sensitive to latency

    Technisch verstehe ich das nicht, aber ich habe dann mal als kurzen Test auf meine lokale SSD einen Snapshot gemacht. Der war nach 2 Minuten (ca. 11GB) fertig. Der zweite Snapshot brauchte ca. 12 Sekunden. Das hört sich schon mal viel besser an, als die Stunden.

    Aktuell ist der Plan den Kopia-Server im Internet zu nutzen damit beerdigt. Das scheint so nicht zu funktionieren. Ich mache da noch einen kurzen Test, diesmal Lokal auf meinem NAS.

  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    292 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Debian Minimal von Mr.Fixit2001

    Linux
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    429 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Release 190531 - Updated Debian Minimal Release

    Kernel Updated to 4.4.180 Additional Kernel Fixes U-Boot patched to fix weird issue where only some EMMC modules will not boot
  • Mainline Kernel 4.18.0-rc3

    Linux
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    946 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet